《大医生》编辑部官网欢迎您!
加入收藏 | 设为主页 
经阴式单孔腹腔镜与经腹多孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R713

基金项目:

河源市科技计划项目(编号:河科081)


Comparative study of vaginal single-port laparoscopy and transabdominal multi-port laparoscopy for hysterectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨经阴式单孔腹腔镜与经腹多孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术的应用效果。方法 选取2020年1月至2021年1月收治于河源长安医院的60例子宫肌瘤患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为观察组(30例)和对照组(30例)。观察组行经阴式单孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术,对照组行经腹多孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术。比较两组患者手术情况、卵巢功能、月经情况以及疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)情况。结果 观察组患者术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.05),观察组患者手术时间、术后排气时间、术后首次下床时间及住院时间均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术前FSH、E2及LH比较均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,两组患者FSH、LH均低于术前,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者E2均高于术前,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后1、3、6月时FSH、LH水平低于对照组,E2高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术前月经量、月经周期比较均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1、3、6月时,两组患者月经量、月经周期均改善,且观察组改善情况优于对照组(P<0.05);术后1、3、7 d时观察组的VAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 经阴式单孔腹腔镜治疗子宫肌瘤疗效可靠,较经腹多孔腹腔镜更具微创优点,可改善患者疼痛情况,术后恢复快。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the application effect of transvaginal single port laparoscopy and transabdominal multi- port laparoscopy for hysterectomy. Methods Sixty patients with uterine fibroids who were admitted to Heyuan Chang'an Hospital from January 2020 to January 2021 were selected as the research objects,according to the random number table method, it is divided into observation group (30 cases) and control group (30 cases). The observation group underwent transvaginal single port laparoscopic myomectomy, and the control group underwent transabdominal multiport laparoscopic myomectomy. The operation status, ovarian function,menstruation status, and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) status were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss of the observation group was less than that of the control group (P<0.05). The operation time, postoperative exhaust time, the first time out of bed after operation and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05); preoperative FSH and E2 in the two groups There was no statistical significance in comparison with LH and LH (P>0.05); 6 months after operation,the FSH and LH of the two groups were lower than those before the operation, and the observation group was lower than the control group (P<0.05); E2 of the two groups were higher than Before operation, the observation group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).The levels of FSH and LH in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1, 3 and 6 months after operation, and E2 was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The menstrual volume and menstrual cycle of the two groups before operation were not statistically significant (P>0.05);1, 3 and 6 months after operation, the menstrual volume and menstrual cycle of the two groups were improved, and the improvement of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery (P<0.05).Conclusion Transvaginal single- port laparoscopy has a reliable effect in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Compared with trans-abdominal multi-port laparoscopy, it has more minimally invasive advantages. It can improve the patient's pain and recover quickly after surgery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-11-15
  • 出版日期: