《大医生》编辑部官网欢迎您!
加入收藏 | 设为主页 
两种不同入路方式应用于髋臼骨折患者的随机对照研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687.3

基金项目:


A randomized controlled study of two different approaches in patients with acetabular fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的? 分析两种不同入路方式在髋臼骨折患者中的应用效果及对患者血清白细胞介素 -6(IL-6)、C- 反应蛋白(CRP)、 降钙素原(PCT)水平的影响。方法? 选取 2018 年 3 月至 2021 年 6 月滨州市中心医院收治的 72 例髋臼骨折患者进行研究,通 过随机数字表法将其分为对照组(36 例)、观察组(36 例)。对照组患者采用髂腹股沟入路术,观察组患者采用改良 Stoppa 入路 术,术后均随访 3 个月。比较两组患者围术期指标,术前、术后 1 周血清炎性因子水平,术前、术后 3 个月生活质量评分,术后 3 个月关节功能、骨折复位情况,术后并发症发生情况。结果? 观察组患者手术时间、术后住院时间、手术切口长度、引流管拔出 时间均短于对照组,术中出血量、术后引流量均低于对照组;术后 1 周,两组患者血清 IL-6、CRP、PCT 水平均高于术前,但观察组 低于对照组;术后 3 个月,两组患者简明健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)量表评分高于术前,且观察组高于对照组;术后 3 个月,观察 组患者关节功能优良率、骨折复位满意率均高于对照组;观察组患者并发症总发生率为 5.56%,而对照组患者并发症总发生率为 25.00%,观察组低于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论? 改良 Stoppa 入路行骨折复位手术可改善髋臼骨折患者围术期指标、关节功能、 骨折复位情况,降低机体炎症反应,并改善患者生活质量,安全性较高。

    Abstract:

    Objective?To analyze the application effects of two different approaches in patients with acetabular fractures and their effects on serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels. Methods?A total of 72 patients with acetabular fractures admitted to Binzhou Central Hospital from March 2018 to June 2021 were selected and divided into the control group (36 cases) and the observation group (36 cases) by the random number table method. The patients in the control group were treated with the operation through the ilioinguinal approach, and the patients in the observation group were treated with the operation through the modified Stoppa approach, and the patients in the two groups were followed up for 3 months after operation. The perioperative indicators, serum inflammatory factor levels before and 1 week after operation, scores of life quality before operation and 3 months after operation, joint function and fracture reduction 3 months after operation, and postoperative complications occurrence of patients in the two groups were compared. Results?The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, surgical incision length, and drainage tube extraction time of patients in the observation group were all shorter than those in the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were all lower than those in the control group; 1 week after operation, the levels of serum IL-6, CRP and PCT of patients in the two groups were higher than those before operation, but the observation group was lower than the control group; 3 months after operation, the scores of the Brief Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) in the two groups were higher than those before operation, and the observation group was higher than the control group; 3 months after operation, the excellent and good rate of joint function and fracture reduction satisfaction rate in the observation group were higher than those in the control group; the total incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.56%, while the total incidence of complications in the control group was 25.00%, the observation group was lower than thecontrol group (all P<0.05). Conclusion?The fracture reduction surgery with improved Stoppa approach can improve perioperative indicators, joint function, fracture reduction of patients with acetabular fractures, reduce inflammatory response, and improve patients' quality of life, and which has higher safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-19
  • 出版日期: